<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Effect Generator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://effectgenerator.com/blog</link>
	<description>Create Flash in a flash, in Flash</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Adding a Flash Ripple Effect to Images on Mouse Over by Brad Stein</title>
		<link>http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=29&#038;cpage=1#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=29#comment-502</guid>
		<description>I want to thank the creator of the image affects for this great service. I am using one of the affects and love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to thank the creator of the image affects for this great service. I am using one of the affects and love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flex vs. Silverlight: The Elephant in the Room by Bart Czernicki</title>
		<link>http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Czernicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35#comment-472</guid>
		<description>@Kris,

It is like you say Adobe has to step up "while they still can".

Forget it when Microsoft starts integrating Silverlight into every product horizontal and vertical.  You are already seeing that with: Windows Azure, Virtual Map SDK, SharePoint, IIS Smooth Streaming etc.  Adobe simply doesn't have anything like that...their dominance right now is: market share and UI...once Silverlight becomes respectable in those areas...game over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kris,</p>
<p>It is like you say Adobe has to step up &#8220;while they still can&#8221;.</p>
<p>Forget it when Microsoft starts integrating Silverlight into every product horizontal and vertical.  You are already seeing that with: Windows Azure, Virtual Map SDK, SharePoint, IIS Smooth Streaming etc.  Adobe simply doesn&#8217;t have anything like that&#8230;their dominance right now is: market share and UI&#8230;once Silverlight becomes respectable in those areas&#8230;game over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flex vs. Silverlight: The Elephant in the Room by ThoseBug</title>
		<link>http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>ThoseBug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35#comment-441</guid>
		<description>bluestix your comment it's very funny, sorry for that , but..If flex would be able to access java libraries...then why we need to use Flex? then it's better JavaFX, don't think the same?...but until JavaFX change his way to do things and take out that horrible script ...many years had gonne.
for now Silverlight is ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bluestix your comment it&#8217;s very funny, sorry for that , but..If flex would be able to access java libraries&#8230;then why we need to use Flex? then it&#8217;s better JavaFX, don&#8217;t think the same?&#8230;but until JavaFX change his way to do things and take out that horrible script &#8230;many years had gonne.<br />
for now Silverlight is ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flex vs. Silverlight: The Elephant in the Room by LudoA</title>
		<link>http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>LudoA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35#comment-440</guid>
		<description>This is incorrect, AFAIK. I'm not an expert on this, but I think:

- You could convert the wav to mp3 in the background by putting it in an interval timer (and letting it execute only once, of course).
- Possibly you could also let this happen server-side with AJAX, if the data needed to create the mp3 (e.g. a wav file) is already stored servver-side.

Or is there anything I'm missing here which makes this impossible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is incorrect, AFAIK. I&#8217;m not an expert on this, but I think:</p>
<p>- You could convert the wav to mp3 in the background by putting it in an interval timer (and letting it execute only once, of course).<br />
- Possibly you could also let this happen server-side with AJAX, if the data needed to create the mp3 (e.g. a wav file) is already stored servver-side.</p>
<p>Or is there anything I&#8217;m missing here which makes this impossible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flex vs. Silverlight: The Elephant in the Room by Kris Hofmans</title>
		<link>http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Hofmans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35#comment-439</guid>
		<description>I admit, you are right, but so was the post about the html rendering in flex not being optimal and lacking things like tinymce. Because of this reason flex wouldn't be suitable for enterprise applications.

This post is a simular, a good point but only for 10-15% of the applications. It's a big enough percentage to care, but doesn't really affect the needs of most applications.

Flex has been getting a lot of exposure and I think it is time for adobe to step up now while they still can, to do all the necessary "base" work like threading because this could impact many of the applications and then go to the nice but really not needed stuff like directly exporting UI designs from photoshop, skins, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit, you are right, but so was the post about the html rendering in flex not being optimal and lacking things like tinymce. Because of this reason flex wouldn&#8217;t be suitable for enterprise applications.</p>
<p>This post is a simular, a good point but only for 10-15% of the applications. It&#8217;s a big enough percentage to care, but doesn&#8217;t really affect the needs of most applications.</p>
<p>Flex has been getting a lot of exposure and I think it is time for adobe to step up now while they still can, to do all the necessary &#8220;base&#8221; work like threading because this could impact many of the applications and then go to the nice but really not needed stuff like directly exporting UI designs from photoshop, skins, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flex vs. Silverlight: The Elephant in the Room by non</title>
		<link>http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>non</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35#comment-438</guid>
		<description>MS will probably abandon it when it fails, just like every internet "technology" they have ever attempted.

But besides that I find the fact that flash doesnt thread pretty sad.  especially when I can write an app for the iphone that will thread perfectly fine.

Perhaps the push to replace flash isnt about flash, but about the fact that we have moved on to a point where noone cares what its called.

Still, when prompted to download silverlight on Vista I steadfastly refuse out of a misplaced sense of pride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS will probably abandon it when it fails, just like every internet &#8220;technology&#8221; they have ever attempted.</p>
<p>But besides that I find the fact that flash doesnt thread pretty sad.  especially when I can write an app for the iphone that will thread perfectly fine.</p>
<p>Perhaps the push to replace flash isnt about flash, but about the fact that we have moved on to a point where noone cares what its called.</p>
<p>Still, when prompted to download silverlight on Vista I steadfastly refuse out of a misplaced sense of pride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flex vs. Silverlight: The Elephant in the Room by bluestix</title>
		<link>http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>bluestix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35#comment-437</guid>
		<description>It is only a matter of time before you can make async calls to a local JVM from a running Flex/Air application.

Then multi-threading will be super easy from Flex. And cross platform. And you will have access to the entire Java library. 

Artemis showed us the way.



As for Silverlight... I live in Redmond. 

I see more open positions for Flash developers at Microsoft then I see for Silverlight developers every time I look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is only a matter of time before you can make async calls to a local JVM from a running Flex/Air application.</p>
<p>Then multi-threading will be super easy from Flex. And cross platform. And you will have access to the entire Java library. </p>
<p>Artemis showed us the way.</p>
<p>As for Silverlight&#8230; I live in Redmond. </p>
<p>I see more open positions for Flash developers at Microsoft then I see for Silverlight developers every time I look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flex vs. Silverlight: The Elephant in the Room by Joe Berkovitz</title>
		<link>http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Berkovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35#comment-436</guid>
		<description>One more technical point that I didn't really clarify: in general, the work involved in breaking up an audio synthesis or decoding/encoding operation has not been especially difficult for us (although threading would have simplified it greatly).  When you play back a piece in Noteflight, audio synthesis takes place in short 50 ms chunks, in between which all pending UI events are handled and the app remains completely responsive.  Is this fun to program? Not really. Is this hard to program? Not really.  I would say that if you take a worker thread and structure it so that it can report on its progress and produce consumable output along the way, you have already done a very good fraction of the work required to avoid the use of threads at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more technical point that I didn&#8217;t really clarify: in general, the work involved in breaking up an audio synthesis or decoding/encoding operation has not been especially difficult for us (although threading would have simplified it greatly).  When you play back a piece in Noteflight, audio synthesis takes place in short 50 ms chunks, in between which all pending UI events are handled and the app remains completely responsive.  Is this fun to program? Not really. Is this hard to program? Not really.  I would say that if you take a worker thread and structure it so that it can report on its progress and produce consumable output along the way, you have already done a very good fraction of the work required to avoid the use of threads at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flex vs. Silverlight: The Elephant in the Room by Joe Berkovitz</title>
		<link>http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Berkovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Gosh, where to start?  There is a lot of ideology flying around this thread.

At Noteflight, I'd like to think we're not particularly ideological.  Silverlight and Flash/Flex are both great platforms, but one of them presently has a 95+% installed base on consumer machines.  Guess which one?  Our decision to use Flash was (as it should be for anyone wishing for mass adoption of their app) primarily driven by the fact that it is already installed on our user's machines, not by its development merits.  Even if Flex sucked (which it patently does not) we would still have just gritted our teeth and coded up Noteflight in AS3.  And if Silverlight takes over (which I'm not betting on, but have no say in) well, we'll just have to port our app to Silverlight, won't we?  We are building an app for the real world out there, not for ourselves.

As for WAV files: the lack of threading played absolutely no role.  What turned out to be more important in the end was that MP3 is a lossy compression algorithm, and we need a lossless approach in order to download and accurately loop sample fragments whose decompressed signal must be absolutely identical to the original.  I note that Flash 10 does in fact include a native MP3 decoding API.

All this aside, as a programmer I would of course prefer to have access to a thread construct in AS3 and would find threads immensely convenient for many aspects of Noteflight.  I'm simply saying that as a platform issue it is really, really far down the list of things that matter.
 
One last point about Noteflight - the author's post says that our site will deliver "mass, systematic theft of music, which has, somehow, to be properly monetized".  I would encourage everyone to look and see what is actually going on on our site, and what is not.  Noteflight's aim is to foster a global musical community, particularly in service of education.  Our business plan is built around people teaching and learning music, not around a site that attracts millions of people who don't want to pay for copyrighted songs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, where to start?  There is a lot of ideology flying around this thread.</p>
<p>At Noteflight, I&#8217;d like to think we&#8217;re not particularly ideological.  Silverlight and Flash/Flex are both great platforms, but one of them presently has a 95+% installed base on consumer machines.  Guess which one?  Our decision to use Flash was (as it should be for anyone wishing for mass adoption of their app) primarily driven by the fact that it is already installed on our user&#8217;s machines, not by its development merits.  Even if Flex sucked (which it patently does not) we would still have just gritted our teeth and coded up Noteflight in AS3.  And if Silverlight takes over (which I&#8217;m not betting on, but have no say in) well, we&#8217;ll just have to port our app to Silverlight, won&#8217;t we?  We are building an app for the real world out there, not for ourselves.</p>
<p>As for WAV files: the lack of threading played absolutely no role.  What turned out to be more important in the end was that MP3 is a lossy compression algorithm, and we need a lossless approach in order to download and accurately loop sample fragments whose decompressed signal must be absolutely identical to the original.  I note that Flash 10 does in fact include a native MP3 decoding API.</p>
<p>All this aside, as a programmer I would of course prefer to have access to a thread construct in AS3 and would find threads immensely convenient for many aspects of Noteflight.  I&#8217;m simply saying that as a platform issue it is really, really far down the list of things that matter.</p>
<p>One last point about Noteflight - the author&#8217;s post says that our site will deliver &#8220;mass, systematic theft of music, which has, somehow, to be properly monetized&#8221;.  I would encourage everyone to look and see what is actually going on on our site, and what is not.  Noteflight&#8217;s aim is to foster a global musical community, particularly in service of education.  Our business plan is built around people teaching and learning music, not around a site that attracts millions of people who don&#8217;t want to pay for copyrighted songs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flex vs. Silverlight: The Elephant in the Room by Doug Holton</title>
		<link>http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Holton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://effectgenerator.com/blog/?p=35#comment-434</guid>
		<description>The elephant in the room, and the biggest hurdle for Silverlight, is Microsoft itself, and the fact that Silverlight is tied to the Microsoft Windows platform.

Today there are more Linux users than Mac users, and do you think Silverlight is ever going to work there?  I know there is Mono's Moonlight, but that isn't supported by Microsoft at all.  I just tested it with the examples mentioned above and some basic examples elsewhere (like a tic tac toe game) and none of them worked at all.

The java platform is coming around, adopting more of the end-user niceties of flash, like quicker loading, easier in-browser installing, etc.  Not to mention it is open source and completely cross-platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The elephant in the room, and the biggest hurdle for Silverlight, is Microsoft itself, and the fact that Silverlight is tied to the Microsoft Windows platform.</p>
<p>Today there are more Linux users than Mac users, and do you think Silverlight is ever going to work there?  I know there is Mono&#8217;s Moonlight, but that isn&#8217;t supported by Microsoft at all.  I just tested it with the examples mentioned above and some basic examples elsewhere (like a tic tac toe game) and none of them worked at all.</p>
<p>The java platform is coming around, adopting more of the end-user niceties of flash, like quicker loading, easier in-browser installing, etc.  Not to mention it is open source and completely cross-platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
